A curve is described by five things: where the curve sits along the blade, how deep it is, how open the face is, the toe shape, and the lie. Manufacturers use their own wording for all five, so BOXPLAY keeps each brand's terminology intact.
Manufacturer facthighSchematic generated from BAUER's documented curve location, face openness. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
Manufacturer highlights: stickhandling, quick/high snapshots.
Schematic generated from BAUER's documented curve location, face openness and blade height. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
P92 geometry with additional blade material where documented by the manufacturer.
Manufacturer highlights: puck control, battles, tips, faceoffs.
Schematic generated from BAUER's documented curve location, face openness. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
Manufacturer highlights: toe control, toe drags, quick release.
Schematic generated from BAUER's documented curve location, face openness. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
Manufacturer highlights: puck control, wrist shots.
Bauer classifies its P88 face as Open. CCM classifies its own P88 as Closed. Both manufacturer statements are retained separately.
Schematic generated from BAUER's documented curve location, face openness. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
Combines P92-like consistency with a more aggressive P28-like toe characteristic.
The P92/P28 wording is a manufacturer description, not a geometric equivalence claim.
Youth-specific pattern with a longer/flatter blade characteristic and an aggressive toe, intended to help youth puck control and elevation.
Manufacturer highlights: youth puck control, puck elevation.
MyBAUER availability verified. No published geometry.
MyBAUER availability verified. No published geometry.
MyBAUER availability verified. No published geometry.
MyBAUER availability verified. No published geometry.
MyBAUER availability verified. No published geometry.
MyBAUER availability verified. No published geometry.
MyBAUER availability verified. No published geometry.
Schematic generated from CCM's documented curve location, depth, face openness. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
Manufacturer highlights: toe drags, high shots.
Schematic generated from CCM's documented curve location, depth, face openness. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
Manufacturer highlights: passing, puck control, hard shooting, all-round.
Schematic generated from CCM's documented curve location, depth, face openness. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
Manufacturer highlights: stickhandling, controlled shots.
CCM classifies this face as Closed. Bauer's P88 is classified Open by Bauer. Manufacturer terminology is preserved per brand.
Schematic generated from CCM's documented curve location, depth, face openness and blade height. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
Blend of P28 and P29 characteristics, with a max-height blade.
Availability verified. Geometry not published — never inferred from the base pattern.
Availability verified. Geometry not published — never inferred from the base pattern.
Referenced by TRUE's blade curve chart as a cross-brand counterpart. No verified CCM first-party source, so no geometry and no equivalence claim.
Current TRUE curve code, evidenced as a purchase option only. TRUE publishes no geometry for it and states no mapping to the legacy TC/MC patterns — none is inferred here.
Schematic generated from TRUE's documented curve location, face openness. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
Published on TRUE's legacy player-stick pages. Curve depth, blade length and blade height are not published. TRUE's current retail lines no longer offer this code under this name.
Schematic generated from TRUE's documented curve location, face openness. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
TRUE documents TC2.5 as the same curve as TC2 with a lie of 5.0.
Published on TRUE's legacy player-stick pages. Curve depth, blade length and blade height are not published. TRUE's current retail lines no longer offer this code under this name.
Schematic generated from TRUE's documented curve location, face openness. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
TRUE documents TC2.5T as the same curve as TC2.5, but taller.
Published on TRUE's legacy player-stick pages. Curve depth, blade length and blade height are not published. TRUE's current retail lines no longer offer this code under this name.
Schematic generated from TRUE's documented curve location, face openness. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
Published on TRUE's legacy player-stick pages. Curve depth, blade length and blade height are not published. TRUE's current retail lines no longer offer this code under this name.
Schematic generated from TRUE's documented curve location, face openness. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
Published on TRUE's legacy player-stick pages. Curve depth, blade length and blade height are not published. TRUE's current retail lines no longer offer this code under this name.
Current TRUE curve code, evidenced as a purchase option only. TRUE publishes no geometry for it and states no mapping to the legacy TC/MC patterns — none is inferred here.
Current TRUE curve code, evidenced as a purchase option only. TRUE publishes no geometry for it and states no mapping to the legacy TC/MC patterns — none is inferred here.
Current TRUE curve code, evidenced as a purchase option only. TRUE publishes no geometry for it and states no mapping to the legacy TC/MC patterns — none is inferred here.
Schematic generated from WARRIOR's documented curve location, face openness. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
Charted by Warrior as W90TM. No Warrior product page sells this exact string; the sold code is W9T. Kept as its own record until Warrior resolves its own naming.
Documented only by a Warrior support answer naming W88 and M88 as the closest current patterns. No geometry published.
Named by Warrior support as a current counterpart to W71, but absent from the blade pattern chart and from the product pages checked. Identity only.
Warrior documents 'Mid-Heel'; BOXPLAY has no matching normalized class, so the normalized location stays NULL rather than being rounded to HEEL or MID.
Schematic generated from WARRIOR's documented curve location, face openness. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
Lie, curve depth and blade height are not published by Warrior.
Schematic generated from WARRIOR's documented curve location, face openness. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
Lie, curve depth and blade height are not published by Warrior.
Schematic generated from WARRIOR's documented curve location, face openness. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
Lie, curve depth and blade height are not published by Warrior.
Schematic generated from WARRIOR's documented curve location, face openness. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
Warrior documents a 'Semi-Square' toe. BOXPLAY's normalized toe classes are ROUND and SQUARE only, so the normalized toe stays NULL.
Schematic generated from WARRIOR's documented curve location, face openness. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
Lie, curve depth and blade height are not published by Warrior.
Schematic generated from WARRIOR's documented curve location, face openness. It is a classification drawing, not a scaled measurement of the blade.
Lie, curve depth and blade height are not published by Warrior.
Warrior support describes W01 as a shallow mid-heel curve with a slightly open face and a round toe, commonly referred to as Savard, Burrows or Lupul.
W01 is absent from Warrior's blade pattern chart. The description above comes from a Warrior support article that could only be retrieved as a cached excerpt, so no geometry fields are stored from it.
Warrior sells this pattern as 'W9T' but lists 'W90TM' in its blade pattern chart. Warrior never states that the two codes are the same pattern, so the charted geometry is held on warrior-w90tm and is not copied here.
A shared pattern code is not evidence of shared geometry. Every relationship below carries its own evidence and confidence.
Same documented base geometry, different blade material. Not an EXACT match: blade height differs.
Documented lie differs (P90TM 6, P28 5), so the two are related but not interchangeable.
Curve location differs: Mid vs Mid-Toe.
Same depth and openness class, clearly different curve location.
Blade height differs; CCM documents max height only for P90TM.
Documented curve location differs (Mid vs Mid/Toe); the relationship rests on manufacturer description, not measured geometry.
Widely treated as counterparts in retail, but no first-party evidence supports VERY_CLOSE or EXACT.
A shared pattern code is not evidence of shared geometry. The conflicting manufacturer terminology is retained on both records.
Every field both manufacturers publish agrees. That is not enough for VERY_CLOSE: lie, curve depth and blade height are unpublished on the Warrior side.
Curve location, face and toe agree; the documented blade length class differs (Medium-Long vs Medium).
Warrior additionally documents a Semi-Square toe, which CCM does not publish for its P88.
The shared '88' is a coincidence of naming: the two manufacturers document opposite face and toe characteristics.
Every charted field matches. Warrior does not state what distinguishes the M-series, so this stays SAME_FAMILY rather than EXACT.
Every charted field matches. Warrior does not state what distinguishes the M-series, so this stays SAME_FAMILY rather than EXACT.
Warrior's own answer, not a geometry comparison: no geometry is published for W71.
M88 itself is an identity-only record with no charted geometry.
Almost certainly the same pattern, but 'almost certainly' is not a documented fact — the charted geometry is deliberately not copied onto W9T.
TRUE claims the equivalence, but the two manufacturers document different curve locations. The conflict is preserved rather than resolved.
Same documented conflict as TC2 vs P92.
The strongest cross-brand claim in the graph: a manufacturer statement that the documented geometry does not contradict.
CCM publishes no lie, so the comparison stops at location, depth class and face.
A full lie step apart, so the claim is kept at LOW confidence.
One manufacturer naming another's pattern is not evidence about that pattern. Blocked until CCM documents P40.
Manufacturer states the identity explicitly; only the documented lie differs.
TRUE states the height difference qualitatively and publishes no blade height value.
These are current, but the manufacturer publishes no geometry for them. Nothing is inferred from a base pattern or a similar code.
Back to stick flex.